<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter vs. Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markobrien.com.au/twitter-vs-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markobrien.com.au/twitter-vs-facebook/</link>
	<description>applied strategy in leadership, teams, projects &#38; communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:04:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ob1</title>
		<link>http://www.markobrien.com.au/twitter-vs-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-1309</link>
		<dc:creator>ob1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markobrien.com.au/?p=535#comment-1309</guid>
		<description>yeah, i currently use ping to update both.  it&#039;s not so much the updating that&#039;s an issue... more the matter of keeping up with both, which just seems a bit much at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i currently use ping to update both.  it&#8217;s not so much the updating that&#8217;s an issue&#8230; more the matter of keeping up with both, which just seems a bit much at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Olsen</title>
		<link>http://www.markobrien.com.au/twitter-vs-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-1308</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Olsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markobrien.com.au/?p=535#comment-1308</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got TwitterFeed (http://twitterfeed.com/) sending my Facebook Status updates to Twitter so that both can be updated by one service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got TwitterFeed (<a href="http://twitterfeed.com/" rel="nofollow">http://twitterfeed.com/</a>) sending my Facebook Status updates to Twitter so that both can be updated by one service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baggas</title>
		<link>http://www.markobrien.com.au/twitter-vs-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator>Baggas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markobrien.com.au/?p=535#comment-1307</guid>
		<description>Twitter will never achieve the ubiquity that facebook has - it&#039;s a handy tool but doesn&#039;t offer the flexibility and versatility that facebook does in the number of ways you can use it to communicate.

Plus many people are attracted to the other features of facebook - sharing photos, posting links and other info... and of course all the other silly games and things that I try and ignore mostly.

If you&#039;re happy to monitor both then keep both but if it&#039;s one or the other, I&#039;d go with the &#039;book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter will never achieve the ubiquity that facebook has &#8211; it&#8217;s a handy tool but doesn&#8217;t offer the flexibility and versatility that facebook does in the number of ways you can use it to communicate.</p>
<p>Plus many people are attracted to the other features of facebook &#8211; sharing photos, posting links and other info&#8230; and of course all the other silly games and things that I try and ignore mostly.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re happy to monitor both then keep both but if it&#8217;s one or the other, I&#8217;d go with the &#8216;book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

